Viewed 933 times

This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison....

Glander

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:07:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Post 902 of 1296
Since 9/30/2010

OK, Zid, I'll bite. How does Mahers comment relate to this subject?

sooner7nc

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:20:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Post 2821 of 2993
Since 10/30/2007

I call shenanigans. SHENANIGANS!

Band on the Run

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:10:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Post 4325 of 5381
Since 12/18/2010

Sources add a nice touch of reality, particularly when you post outlandish stuff.

Not biting.

FlyingHighNow

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:47:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Michigan

Post 20877 of 21769
Since 9/27/2003

I didn't get my ss# until my mid teens, during the 1970's. Mine used to belong to Amelia Earhart.

FlyingHighNow

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:50:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Michigan

Post 20878 of 21769
Since 9/27/2003

Without Amelia Earhart making such a profound sacrifice, I might not have been able to work at the Krystal Burger the summer of 75.

I dedicate this song to Amelia. Because you know, Amelia, still waters run deep.

BizzyBee

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:34:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

California

Post 8140 of 8587
Since 1/9/2006

Diest

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:42:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Post 516 of 807
Since 6/8/2011

As a side point the SS system didnt start till 37.

FlyingHighNow

Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:03:00 GMT (2/7/2012)

Michigan

Post 20882 of 21769
Since 9/27/2003

As a side point the SS system didnt start till 37.

The year Amelia "disappeared." Shhhhh. Don't tell anybody.

Confirm ...